Logo
Search for

Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages e294-e299 (June 2010)


View previous. 25 of 33 View next.

Clinical characteristics and laboratory testing of patients with suspected HIT: A survey on current practice in 11 university hospitals in France

Audrey Bideta, Brigitte Tardy Poncetb, Dominique Desprezc, Emmanuel de Maistred, Emilie Preslese, Thomas Lecomptef, Cecile Lavenu-Bombledg, Marie Genevieve Huisseh, Martine Wolfi, Pierre Morangej, Evelyne Racadotk, Christine Moutona, Lelia GruneBaumc, Claire Pouplardl, Bernard TardyeCorresponding Author Informationemail address, for the GEHT-HIT study group

Received 1 October 2009; received in revised form 22 January 2010; accepted 2 February 2010. published online 24 February 2010.

Abstract 

Summary

We undertook a survey of French university hospital hematological laboratories to ascertain the clinical characteristics of patients with suspected HIT, the laboratory tests performed, and the therapeutic strategy adopted in current practice.

Methods

A standardized medical records database for patients with suspected HIT was sent to 19 laboratories. During two months, all consecutive patients for whom a biological test was performed were included.

Results

169 patients were included, 27 (16%) patients having a final diagnosis of HIT. At the time HIT was suspected, the heparin duration and the level of thrombocytopenia were similar in HIT- positive and HIT-negative groups. The use of unfractionated heparin, a therapeutic heparin dose regimen and the presence of thrombotic complications were significantly more frequent in HIT-positive patients. When the heparin dose regimen was taken into account, only thrombotic complications under a therapeutic dose regimen were significantly increased in HIT-positive patients. Eighty-six percent of patients presented at least one alternative diagnosis of thrombocytopenia without significant difference between the two groups. Laboratory tests were performed after a mean of 0.3days and mainly consisted of antigen assays. At the time HIT was suspected, heparin was stopped in 56 (33%) patients, being replaced mainly by danaparoid. Only three laboratories declared they usually received all the necessary clinical information to establish the likelihood of HIT.

Conclusion

In current practice in France, the clinical probability of HIT is rarely established, leading to systematic requests for laboratory HIT tests.

a Laboratory of Hematology, Hôpital Cardiologique-Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, France

b Department of Hemostasis, EA3065, CHU Saint Etienne, France

c Laboratory of Hematology, CHU Strasbourg, France

d Department of Hemostasis, CHU Dijon, France

e Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inserm CIE3, CHU Saint Etienne, France

f Department of Hemostasis, CHU Nancy, France

g Laboratory of Hematology, AP-HP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, CHU de Créteil, France

h Laboratory of Hematology, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Bichat, CHU Paris, France

i Laboratory of Hematology, AP-HP, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, CHU Clamart, France

j Laboratory of Hematology, CHU Marseille, France

k Department of Hemostasis, EFS de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, CHU Besançon, France

l Department of Hemostasis, CHU Tours, France

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inserm CIE3, CHU Saint Etienne, France.

PII: S0049-3848(10)00130-1

doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2010.02.003


View previous. 25 of 33 View next.