Thrombosis Research
Volume 118, Issue 3 , Pages 385-395, 2006

Thromboembolism and anticoagulant management in hemodialysis patients: A practical guide to clinical management

  • Dorothy S. Lo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Christian G. Rabbat

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • ,
  • Catherine M. Clase

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
    • Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. 25 Charlton Ave. East, Suite 708, Hamilton, ON, Canada, L8N 1Y2. Tel.: +1 905 521 6094; fax: +1 905 521 6153.

Received 4 March 2005; received in revised form 4 March 2005; accepted 8 March 2005.

Abstract 

The need for anticoagulation in dialysis patients is common and the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation in this population is high. While direct data are lacking on the management of anticoagulation in dialysis patients, careful weighing of risks and benefits on the basis of evidence from other populations is crucial. VTE should be managed with adjusted dose warfarin for most patients. Placement of an inferior vena cava filter is a reasonable option for those patients with unacceptable bleeding risks. Studies are ongoing to assess the safety of some low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), which may potentially be useful for long-term anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients. In atrial fibrillation the available data on risk of bleeding, risk of stroke, and patient preferences should all be taken into account when considering long-term anticoagulation. We have constructed an evidence model to help quantitate the risks and benefits for an individual patient. The impact of dialysis on risk of bleeding is such that the risk of bleeding will outweigh the benefit in many patients, and anticoagulation will not be used: in some of these patients aspirin therapy may be an alternative. Finally, ‘in the area of prevention of graft and access thrombosis, some randomized controlled trials are available, but none have to date shown benefit from anticoagulation for primary or secondary prevention of thrombosis, and the risk of bleeding in these studies was high.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0049-3848(05)00214-8

doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2005.03.031

Thrombosis Research
Volume 118, Issue 3 , Pages 385-395, 2006